Skip to main content

Regulatory Operating Model (overview)

How ktayl — a regulated commercial-lines / IARD insurer — turns ~17 regulatory frameworks from a documentation burden into a design-time discipline. This page is the map; the detail lives in two artifacts.

:::note Insurer ≠ bank · two-layer Spine = Solvency II + transversal EU/FR frameworks (DORA, GDPR, EU AI Act, IDD, AML/sanctions, IFRS 17, SFDR…). CRR/CRD/PSD2 don't apply. This is the ktayl-solution IS obligation model; Retrieva is a separate product that only proves the DORA third-party slice. :::

The core idea — compliance by design, not a silo​

Regulation attaches where work happens, and one capability triggers many frameworks at once. The FDE discovery chain carries every capability through its regulatory tail:

business process → pain → systems + data → AI/automation → value
→ REGULATORY IMPACT → CONTROLS REQUIRED → AUDIT EVIDENCE → MONITORING

Controls are declared at design time (verified at the security/architecture governance gate), and evidence accrues to a control library owned by Regulatory & Compliance (#15). Standard: bmad-compliance.md The regulatory layer.

The two artifacts​

ArtifactWhat it isWhere
Obligations Registerthe authoritative map — every framework × owner/systems/data/controls/ACPR-EIOPA ref/applicability caveat/statusktayl-compliance/docs/obligations-register.md (epic RC-05)
AI-Act Gateclassify every AI use case by risk tier → proportionate controls, at design timeAI Act Gate

Framework → domain ownership (who owns / consumes what)​

  • Solvency II (spine) → spans UW → Pricing → Claims → Reserves → Reinsurance → Finance → Reporting — not just Finance.
  • DORA → Enterprise IT (#3) + Retrieva (third-party ICT register).
  • GDPR → cross-cutting; DPO/Compliance (#15); Presidio is the deployed PII control.
  • EU AI Act → AI Platform (#4) + Compliance (#15) via the AI-Act gate.
  • IDD/DDA → Distribution & CRM (#13).
  • AML / Sanctions → Regulatory & Compliance (#15).
  • IFRS 17 / statutory → Insurance Finance & Billing (#14).
  • Reinsurance / International / Tax → #22 / #23 / #14.

The ktayl AI-Act nuance (why this is sharp, not box-ticking)​

The Act's high-risk insurance item is life & health pricing for natural persons. ktayl is B2B / IARD — it insures companies, not natural persons, and not life/health — so most of its UW/pricing AI is limited-risk, not high-risk. The real high-risk vectors are narrow (claimants, sole traders, HR AI, autonomous decisions) where GDPR Art. 22 often bites harder than the Act. Getting that scoping right is the insurance-FDE differentiator. Full rubric: AI Act Gate.

How it respects build-order​

The register + gate are governance (cheap, done now); actual controls are implemented per capability as each domain is built (business-tools-first). The map fills itself in as domains stand up.